Preliminary Philosophical Treatise on Psychology
The Nature of All
Authentic Sciences and thus Psychology
It is to be
known by all scientists that authentic science cannot be separated from He who
commissioned it, that is God in the flesh our Lord Jesus Christ. They who
separate the object of matter from the Creator and Lord of Matter fall into
serious error and will never discover the fullness of the truth. Simply observe
the certain deterioration of the world due to the divorce of the sciences from
God. Thus psychology in its true nature is also very close to God, because it
concerns the psyche or the soul or anima, where the image of God is primarily.
The Fundamental Nature of
the Psyche
The psyche
or the soul constitutes everything that a man is. The soul does not inhabit the
body, instead the body inhabits the soul. The soul refers to the totality but
more accurately the fundamental reality of man. Thus there is a real
distinction between the essence of man, which we call soul, and the body which
is the means of the soul’s manifestation and action. Psychology concerns
herself with that essence of man, the soul, over the body. Anything bodily is
studied in relation to the soul. Since the formal object of psychology is the
soul per se, it is distinct from theology which studies the soul in
relation to her Creator, and distinct from philosophy which studies the soul as
Being instead of the soul as soul. Psychology precisely studies Soul as Soul.
Against Materialist
Psychology
I do not
refute the psychosomatic unity of the body and the soul, what I do reject is
the absolute materialist reduction of the soul to the body. As if the soul is
the body and the body is the soul. There is unity between the body and the soul
for sure, but neither is reducible to the other. The body is not just a
projection of the soul nor is the soul just an emergent property of the body. Therefore
any psychology which immediately assumes a materialist conception of reality
has to be rejected as a false psychology.
In the
following text I shall ground the basic refutations of materialism as a whole.
Against Materialism
I first
distinguish according to Kant and all orthodox philosophers that there is a
distinction between appearance and the thing-in-itself. The appearance is
formless, it is flat and takes up no space at all. It is a mere conception,
while the thing certainly takes space. In elaboration, the laws which govern
matter are certainly immaterial. Ideas are immaterial. Feelings are immaterial.
We can certainly take material representations of these things, but there is no
reducibility to matter here. Can there be a material idea? No, only a material
representation or manifestation of idea, but the idea itself is pure spirit or
extension of spirit. This refutes materialism sufficiently.
A Critique on Restricted
Science
Science
ought to remain distinct but not separate from all modes of study. What is
within the domain of the sense, science has authority over. Yet when it comes
to interpretation of the immaterial form of that sense data, science must
submit to philosophy. Even more so when it comes to interpretation according to
the highest causes, science must submit to theology. The current science which
denies philosophy and theology is a stupid science, it is irrational and does
not see the fullness of truth. If only science would see the truths of
philosophy and theology, then science would be so much more useful and
enlightening to humanity.The Humanistic Nature of
Psychology
While there
is indeed animal psychology, the general focus of psychology as commonly
understood by people is the human soul, the substantial form of humanity. This
is not to say that psychology is completely humanistic as some would define
humanism. Rather when I say that psychology is humanist, I mean that it is
focused on everything human, not that humanity is the standard of measurement
nor is humanity the absolute of all absolutes. As such when psychology studies
humanity, it studies everything pertaining to humanity, including their
lowliness and their emptiness as compared to the universe beyond or even more
God Himself.
The Dual Substance of
Humanity
Man has two
substances, the body and the soul, otherwise the material and the immaterial. How
shall we demonstrate that this is true? It is obvious for each observer to
prove to themselves that they have a body and a soul, yet how do we prove that other
human beings have a soul just as we do? The answer is by language or by the
Word. That we may speak with others and reason together and feel together is
sufficient evidence, though not perfect, to demonstrate the existence of the
experiencing soul in another person. The best way though is simply to show that
Reality itself is Psychological.
Abstract Foundation of the
Soul or Spirit
In this
section I shall explore what founds the soul or spirit in reality. First, since
we use two words, we ought to distinguish them. They refer to the same
immaterial object, but a spirit typically means a bodiless immaterial being of
intellect and will, while a soul typically means an immaterial being of
intellect and will inhabiting and animating a body. I shall treat the matter of
the spirit first, as they are the foundations of all reality, animating all of
reality. The first Spirit is God, and the second group of Spirits are the
angels, the servants of God.
The general
property of God and the angels is that they all have intellect and will. For
that matter we ought to discern the nature of the intellect and the will. The
will is typically the easier property to explain, it is the capacity of
determination. While the intellect is the capacity of knowledge. Yet what is
knowledge? Knowledge is also determination, yet it is passive, at least in an
“analogical” sense. For the will is to determine the other, while to know is to
have yourself be determined by another.
The order
of Spirit is wholly different in God than in creation so the description above
is appropriate for those beings created. We shall now properly treat the
psychic property of the human soul. The human soul is indeed a compound of
intellect and will, the capacity to receive and give knowledge to others. There
are two aspects to knowledge, the objective and the moral aspect of knowledge.
The objective aspect of knowledge is based on the thing in itself, while the
moral aspect of knowledge is based on the relations between the soul and the
object. For all of morality is summed up in the notions of whole relations.
Comments
Post a Comment